Nursing SOAP Note Charting: Writing Progress Notes with Templates, Format, and Examples

SOAP note charting remains one of the most widely used methods of clinical documentation, offering healthcare professionals a clear and structured way to record patient encounters. Much like standardized pathways in medicine, this approach provides consistency, reduces ambiguity, and ensures that critical details of a patient’s condition and care are not overlooked. By organizing information into four sections—Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan—the SOAP format creates a logical flow that supports clinical reasoning, treatment planning, and continuity of care.

What makes SOAP notes especially valuable is their ability to bridge communication among diverse health professionals. Whether written by physicians, nurses, therapists, or mental health professionals, a well-structured SOAP note captures not only the patient’s immediate concerns but also the measurable findings, relevant history, and proposed interventions. This framework transforms a simple clinical note into a tool that supports collaboration, accuracy in medical records, and evidence-based decision-making.

Beyond documentation, SOAP notes are integral to patient care because they streamline the note-taking process while promoting clarity and accountability. A thorough yet concise chart enables providers to track changes over time, identify patterns, and refine treatment plans in line with evolving patient needs. In training settings, such as nursing education and residency programs, mastering SOAP note writing equips learners with the skills to communicate effectively, justify clinical decisions, and provide comprehensive patient records.

This article examines SOAP note charting in depth—its structure, significance, and applications in healthcare. It also explores the components of SOAP notes, provides examples to help illustrate best practices, and discusses templates and digital tools that can enhance clinical documentation. By understanding both the fundamentals and advanced practices of SOAP note charting, healthcare providers can improve documentation accuracy, strengthen collaboration, and ultimately support better patient outcomes.

Guide to SOAP Notes: Understanding SOAP Documentation in Healthcare

SOAP note charting is a problem-oriented way to structure a patient encounter into four linked parts—Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan—so that clinical reasoning is explicit and follow-up actions are traceable. The approach descends from Lawrence Weed’s Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR), designed to “guide and teach” by organizing information around problems and documenting the thinking that connects data to decisions. In practice, this structure supports consistent progress note entries, safer handoffs, and defensible medical record keeping across paper and electronic systems. 

Because the four parts map naturally to the flow of a clinical visit—patient story, measurable findings, interpretation, and next steps—teams can review what changed, why it matters, and how the plan will address it. This shared structure improves interprofessional communication and continuity, whether the encounter occurs in primary care, inpatient units, rehabilitation, or behavioral health.

Components of a SOAP Note: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan

S — Subjective section ; what to document

The subjective section captures the patient’s words and context: chief complaint, history of present illness, pertinent medical history (including medications/allergies), and other relevant information from the review of systems or social history. It reflects the patient’s perspective and helps set priorities for the visit.
Mini-example (headache): “Throbbing headache for 3 days; worse with light; relieved partially by ibuprofen; no fever or neck stiffness.” 

O — Objective section ; measurement and findings

The objective section summarizes observable, measurable findings from the exam and tests: vital signs, structured physical-exam observations by system, point-of-care testing, labs, and imaging. Organizing this section by system (e.g., neuro, cardio-respiratory) makes later review more reliable.
Mini-example: “T 37.1 °C, BP 128/76; alert; photophobia present; no focal neurologic deficit; no meningismus.” 

A — Assessment section ; clinical reasoning and differential

Here the clinician synthesizes the story and data into a working diagnosis with differential diagnoses, explaining how the findings support or argue against each possibility. This is the interpretive link between data and decisions.
Mini-example: “Likely migraine without aura; consider tension-type headache; low suspicion meningitis given afebrile exam.” 

P — Plan section ; interventions, follow-up, and streamline care

The plan section details tests, therapeutics, patient education, referrals, and follow-up intervals—ideally itemized per problem. It records the treatment plan and any contingency instructions (what to do if symptoms change).
Mini-example: “Trial sumatriptan now; headache diary; trigger avoidance; return if red flags (fever, stiff neck, neuro deficit); follow-up in 2 weeks.” 

Why this structure matters: separating the patient’s report from measurable findings avoids conflating perceptions with facts; documenting interpretation distinguishes clinical judgment; and writing concrete next steps clarifies accountability for care. This mirrors widely taught medical-education guidance and aligns with common documentation format expectations.

Why is SOAP Note Charting important in healthcare?

1) It makes clinical thinking auditable and teachable.
SOAP originated to make reasoning visible—what you considered, how you decided, and what you plan to do—so that others can review and learn from it. That transparency supports supervision, quality improvement, and professional development. 

2) It improves teamwork and handoffs.
Standardized, succinct entries enable faster, safer information transfer during transitions (e.g., shift changes, inter-unit moves). Handoff frameworks from AHRQ emphasize clarity, contingencies, and explicit responsibility—elements the SOAP structure naturally supports. 

3) It supports compliance, quality, and reimbursement.
Clear linkage from findings to the assessment section and plan demonstrates medical necessity and informs E/M level selection under AMA CPT guidance. While a SOAP structure isn’t mandated, documenting medical decision making and plan details is central to compliant coding and quality review. 

4) It strengthens safety and risk management.
Organized, timely entries reduce ambiguity, facilitate rapid chart review, and contribute to a defensible record in the event of scrutiny. Accrediting bodies (e.g., The Joint Commission) emphasize accessible, well-organized documentation in either paper or electronic systems. 

5) It enhances patient-centered care.
By tracking symptoms, objective trends, and response to intervention over time, clinicians can adjust goals and plan section actions to what matters most to the patient, thereby supporting continuity of care.

How Health Professionals Use SOAP Notes

Physicians, PAs, and NPs
Used for daily inpatient entries and ambulatory visits to document histories, exams, working diagnoses, and follow-up steps in a structured chart entry. The format supports clinical communication and E/M documentation.

Nurses
Applied to focused shift updates and nursing documentation to track status changes, interventions, and responses in alignment with nursing care plans. ANA guidance underscores the importance of clear, accurate, accessible entries across settings. 

Rehabilitation clinicians (PT/OT/SLP)
Used to record function-focused encounters, progress toward goals, and skilled services delivered, supporting justification for ongoing therapy. Professional guidance highlights defensible, problem-oriented documentation of each visit. 

Mental health professionals
“Therapy SOAP” notes connect client reports with observed behaviors, the clinical formulation, and planned interventions, aligning record-keeping with ethical and regulatory expectations

Cross-discipline micro-example (same patient, different users)

• Primary care (S/O): “Persistent cough 2 weeks; non-smoker; afebrile; lungs with scattered wheezes.” (A/P): “Post-viral bronchial hyperreactivity; trial inhaled bronchodilator; return if dyspnea.”
• Nursing (O): “SpO₂ 98% RA; instructed on spacer use.” (P): “Reassess technique at discharge; educational handout provided.”
• Physical therapy (O): “Tolerated 6-minute walk without desaturation.” (P): “Continue activity as tolerated; breathing exercises.”
• Behavioral health (S): “Anxious about persistent symptoms.” (A/P): “Health-related anxiety; brief CBT strategies; check-in next visit.”

This illustrates how a common structure supports discipline-specific goals while keeping the overall note includes clear links from findings to actions.

SOAP Note Template: Formats to Streamline Progress Notes and Charts

A SOAP note is more than a simple progress entry—it is a structured format that organizes a patient encounter into four logical parts: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. This systematic framework allows healthcare professionals to capture not only the patient’s voice but also measurable data, their own clinical reasoning, and the specific treatment plan that follows. Together, these sections create a unified clinical story that can be followed over time, supporting continuity, safety, and high-quality patient care.

By clearly distinguishing subjective and objective information from interpretation and decision-making, SOAP notes provide a consistent method of documentation that strengthens clinical documentation standards. Each section has unique expectations, and together they form the foundation of effective note-taking in medical and nursing practice.

Elements of the Subjective section 

The subjective section records the patient’s perspective, usually expressed in their own words. It includes what the patient reports rather than what the clinician measures. This is where context, history, and patient priorities are captured, forming the basis for the clinical reasoning that follows.

Key elements:

• Chief complaint (CC): A short statement of why the patient is seeking care. This should be direct and concise, often quoted verbatim.
• History of present illness (HPI): A detailed narrative describing the onset, location, duration, character, aggravating and relieving factors, timing, and progression of symptoms. Clinicians often use the OLDCARTS mnemonic (Onset, Location, Duration, Character, Aggravating/Relieving, Timing, Severity) to structure this.
• Past medical history: Relevant past medical and surgical history, family history, and social history (e.g., smoking, alcohol, occupation).
• Medications and allergies: Including doses, frequency, and reactions.
• Other relevant information: Review of systems related to the chief complaint (e.g., headache, dizziness, nausea).

Example (Subjective):

“I’ve had a throbbing headache on the right side of my head for three days. It gets worse when I’m in bright light. I took ibuprofen which helped a little, but the pain always comes back. I haven’t had fever or neck stiffness. My father has a history of migraines.”

Why it matters: This section sets the stage for the rest of the SOAP note. It ensures that the patient’s concerns are heard and recorded, guiding the focus of the clinical encounter. For nursing documentation, the subjective section also includes observations of how the patient perceives their illness, which is crucial in both acute care and chronic management.

Structure and Format of the Objective Section

The objective section focuses on measurable and observable findings—facts rather than perceptions. This makes it the most standardized portion of the SOAP note and vital for ensuring thorough documentation.

Core components:

• Vital signs: Temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and sometimes pain scores.
• General appearance: Patient’s overall state (alert, in distress, comfortable, oriented).
• Physical examination findings: Documented system by system (e.g., cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological). Include pertinent positives and negatives.
• Diagnostic tests: Point-of-care results, labs, imaging, or procedures performed.
• Functional measures: In therapy or rehabilitation, this may include gait testing, strength scores, or range of motion.

Example (Objective):

“BP 128/76, HR 88, Temp 37.1 °C, SpO₂ 98% RA. Alert, oriented x3. Pupils equal and reactive, photophobia present. No focal neurological deficits. Neck supple, no nuchal rigidity.”

Why it matters: This section is essential for creating a reliable medical record that can be reviewed by multiple providers. It provides the evidence base that supports the clinician’s later interpretation in the assessment section. Accurate and concise recording of vital signs, exam results, and tests is considered a best practice in clinical note documentation.

Details Captured in the Assessment Section

The assessment section is the clinician’s interpretation. This is where subjective reports and objective findings are synthesized into a coherent clinical judgment. It is considered the intellectual heart of the SOAP note.

Core components:

• Primary diagnosis or impression – the most likely condition based on current data.
• Differential diagnoses – other conditions that could explain the findings, prioritized from most to least likely.
• Rationale – brief reasoning that connects the subjective and objective sections to the clinical impression.
• Status of chronic conditions – updates on pre-existing problems (e.g., “Hypertension: controlled”).

Example (Assessment):

“Presentation consistent with migraine without aura, given throbbing unilateral headache, photophobia, and positive family history. Tension-type headache is also possible. Low suspicion for meningitis given normal vital signs and absence of meningeal signs.”

Why it matters: The assessment demonstrates clinical reasoning and ensures accountability. It makes the clinician’s thought process transparent, which is crucial for audits, peer review, and teaching. In the section of a SOAP note addressing mental health, for instance, the assessment might include both diagnostic impressions and progress toward therapy goals.

Significance of the Plan section

The plan section translates interpretation into action. It provides a roadmap for addressing the problems identified in the assessment and ensures continuity between encounters.

Key elements:

• Treatment plan: Medications (with dose, route, frequency), procedures, therapies, and lifestyle modifications.
• Diagnostic tests: Imaging, labs, or specialist consults with rationale.
• Interventions and education: Patient instructions, counseling, or safety planning.
• Follow-up care: Next appointment, interval for monitoring, and criteria for urgent return.
• Contingencies: What to do if symptoms worsen (red-flag guidance).

Example (Plan):

“Administer sumatriptan 50 mg as needed for headache onset. Educate patient to keep a headache diary and avoid known triggers (caffeine, bright lights). Order basic labs to rule out metabolic contributors. No imaging unless red flags appear (fever, progressive neuro deficit). Schedule follow-up in 2 weeks. Provide patient handout on migraine management.”

Why it matters: The plan operationalizes the SOAP framework. It ensures that the note includes actionable next steps, which makes the entry not just descriptive but prescriptive. For mental health professionals, a therapy plan might include CBT techniques, frequency of sessions, and measurable progress indicators. For nurses, it might list monitoring frequency, medication administration, and education provided.

A strong plan enhances continuity of care, aligns team members on expectations, and ensures that notes help guide safe, efficient patient management. In education, being able to write a SOAP note with a clear, actionable plan is considered one of the most important competencies for new providers.

How to Create a SOAP Note Charting Template?

A SOAP note charting template provides clinicians with a structured framework for documenting patient encounters efficiently and consistently. Instead of starting from scratch, a template organizes the four core sections—Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan—into a user-friendly charting format. This not only improves accuracy and completeness but also ensures that documentation meets professional and regulatory best practices.

Whether used in paper charts or electronic health records (EHRs), a well-designed template saves time, reduces omissions, and supports clear communication among the healthcare team. Below, we explore the essential elements, the role of technology, and some widely used examples.

What elements should be included in a SOAP Note template?

Every SOAP note template should be tailored to its clinical context, but there are universal elements that form the foundation of best practice documentation.

1. Patient Demographics and Identifiers

• Full name, age, sex, date of birth, medical record number, date/time of encounter, and provider’s name.
• These identifiers reduce the risk of documentation mix-ups and ensure legal compliance.
• Example: A pediatric SOAP template might automatically include weight percentile and developmental milestones as part of patient identifiers.

2. Subjective Section Prompts

• Chief complaint in the patient’s own words (“I’ve had chest pain for two hours”).
• History of Present Illness (HPI), including location, onset, duration, character, and associated symptoms (the OLD CARTS method).
• Past medical history, medications, allergies, family history, and social history.
• Best practice tip: Use structured fields for pain rating scales (e.g., 0–10 numeric scale). This ensures clarity when charting subjective data.

3. Objective Section Fields

• Vital signs, physical exam findings, lab and imaging results.
• Organized by system (e.g., cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal).
• Example: For a patient with asthma, the Objective section might include “Wheezing on auscultation, SpO₂ 92% on room air, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate 250 L/min.”

4. Assessment Section Guidance

• Primary working diagnosis.
• Differential diagnoses ranked by likelihood.
• Justification linking subjective and objective findings to the diagnostic impression.
• Example: “Assessment: Likely community-acquired pneumonia based on fever, productive cough, and chest X-ray infiltrates. Differential: pulmonary embolism, COPD exacerbation.”

5. Plan Section Prompts

• Immediate management (e.g., medications, interventions).
• Long-term plan (referrals, monitoring, lifestyle modifications).
• Patient education and follow-up instructions.
• Example: “Plan: Start amoxicillin 500 mg TID x 7 days, schedule chest X-ray in 2 weeks, advise rest, hydration, and return if symptoms worsen.”

6. Signature and Legal Documentation

• Provider’s signature, role, and date/time stamp to authenticate the note.
• Some institutions also require co-signatures for students or residents.

Together, these elements make a SOAP note both comprehensive and standardized, while still flexible enough for specialty-specific use.

How can technology enhance the SOAP Note charting process?

Technology has redefined the way healthcare professionals write SOAP notes. Digital charting systems embed templates into the EHR (Electronic Health Record), guiding clinicians step-by-step through each section.

Advantages of technology in SOAP note documentation include:

1. Improved Efficiency
   • Auto-population of patient demographics, medication lists, and lab results.
   • Use of “smart phrases” or shortcuts for common conditions (“.DM2” auto-fills standard diabetes follow-up plan).
2. Enhanced Accuracy
   • Clinical decision support tools flag incomplete sections or contraindicated orders.
   • Drop-down menus standardize language (e.g., “lung sounds: clear/diminished/wheezing”).
3. Accessibility and Collaboration
   • Multiple providers can access and update SOAP notes in real time.
   • Facilitates interdisciplinary care—nurses, physicians, and therapists all read from the same chart.
4. Integration with Telehealth and Mobile Apps
   • Providers can dictate SOAP notes during virtual consultations.
   • Mobile platforms allow quick charting in community or home health settings.
5. Data Analytics for Quality Improvement
   • Aggregated SOAP notes provide insights into outcomes and guideline adherence.
   • Example: Reviewing asthma SOAP notes across a clinic may reveal gaps in patient education or follow-up scheduling.

What are some examples of digital SOAP Note templates?

Digital SOAP note templates differ by specialty and platform. Here are practical examples:

1. EHR-Integrated SOAP Templates

• Systems like Epic and Cerner embed SOAP charts directly into workflows.
• Example: In Epic, choosing “Chest Pain Visit” opens a SOAP note template pre-loaded with cardiovascular system checklists, risk factor fields, and diagnostic orders.

2. Mental Health SOAP Templates

• Platforms like TheraNest or SimplePractice tailor templates for counseling and psychiatry.
• Example: Subjective field may prompt for “Patient mood,” “Thought content,” and “Sleep quality.” Plan fields emphasize therapy goals and progress tracking.

3. Nursing SOAP Templates

• Nursing documentation often uses simplified digital SOAP notes with checklists for wound care, IV therapy, or post-op assessments.
• Example: In perioperative care, Objective fields might include wound appearance, drainage, and vital signs; Plan section includes pain management and mobility encouragement.

4. Educational SOAP Note Examples

• Medical and nursing schools use fill-in-the-blank SOAP templates in Word or PDF.
• Example: Students may practice documenting a simulated patient encounter: “CC: Headache. HPI: 24-year-old student with 3-day history of throbbing headache…”

5. Specialty-Specific Templates

• Physical therapy: SOAP templates include functional goals, exercise regimen, and mobility assessment.
• Pediatrics: Templates integrate growth charts and developmental milestones.
• Emergency medicine: Templates prioritize brevity with dropdowns for trauma assessments.

What are Best Practices for Using SOAP Notes?

SOAP Note Charting is one of the most widely used methods of clinical documentation in healthcare. Beyond being a charting format, it is a thinking framework that helps providers organize patient encounters, connect subjective complaints to objective findings, and build logical assessments and treatment plans. To maximize the benefits of SOAP notes, healthcare professionals must follow best practices that ensure accuracy, clarity, and clinical utility.

How can healthcare professionals ensure accuracy in SOAP notes?

Accuracy in SOAP notes is essential because they serve multiple functions: legal records, clinical references, communication tools, and educational documents. Inaccurate or incomplete charting can lead to medical errors, miscommunication, and compromised patient outcomes.

Here’s how providers can ensure precision:

1. Maintain Clear Separation of Sections
   • Each part of the SOAP format has a distinct purpose. Mixing information reduces clarity.
   • Example: “Patient reports severe dizziness” belongs in Subjective, while “BP 85/60 mmHg and HR 120 bpm” belongs in Objective.
2. Use Measurable, Observable, and Standardized Data
   • Replace vague descriptions with quantifiable data.
   • Example: Instead of “wound healing well,” document “2 cm laceration with 50% granulation tissue, no erythema or discharge.”
3. Incorporate Diagnostic Correlation
   • Link findings logically across sections.
   • Example: Patient reports chest tightness (Subjective); ECG shows ST elevation (Objective); Assessment lists acute MI; Plan includes emergency PCI.
4. Ensure Completeness Without Overload
   • Comprehensive does not mean verbose. Avoid unnecessary repetition.
   • Example: Document all pertinent negatives (e.g., “denies fever, cough, or palpitations”) but avoid including irrelevant unrelated systems unless they affect the current problem.
5. Document Patient’s Own Words
   • Quoting patients directly in the Subjective section improves accuracy.
   • Example: Write: “Patient states, ‘The pain feels like burning in my chest.’”
6. Time-Sensitive Documentation
   • Notes should be written immediately after encounters to avoid recall errors.
   • Electronic Health Records (EHR) often include time stamps to maintain integrity.

What common mistakes should be avoided in SOAP Note charting?

Despite training, healthcare professionals often fall into documentation pitfalls. Recognizing these common mistakes and knowing how to correct them is part of SOAP note best practice.

1. Blurring Subjective and Objective Data
   • Mistake: Recording lab values under Subjective.
   • Correction: Always categorize based on the source (patient vs. clinical evidence).
2. Ambiguity and Lack of Detail
   • Mistake: Writing “patient improved.”
   • Correction: Document the measurable change: “Patient reports reduction in pain from 8/10 to 3/10.”
3. Over-Reliance on Templates
   • Mistake: Copying forward irrelevant information.
   • Correction: Customize every SOAP note to the specific encounter.
4. Failure to Justify Assessment
   • Mistake: Listing a diagnosis without supporting rationale.
   • Correction: Back assessments with data from Subjective and Objective sections.
   • Example: “Assessment: Pneumonia supported by fever (38.9°C), productive cough, elevated WBC, and infiltrates on chest X-ray.”
5. Neglecting the Plan Section
   • Mistake: Writing “continue current treatment.”
   • Correction: Specify medication changes, patient education, monitoring, and follow-up intervals.
6. Overuse of Non-Standard Abbreviations
   • Mistake: Using ambiguous shorthand like “Pt ↑ HR” (patient increased heart rate).
   • Correction: Follow institutional standards or write out terms.
7. Incomplete Follow-Up Documentation
   • Mistake: Omitting whether the patient understood the plan.
   • Correction: Include statements such as “Patient verbalized understanding of inhaler technique.”

How often should SOAP notes be updated or reviewed?

SOAP notes are dynamic documents. The frequency of updates depends on the care setting, acuity of the patient’s condition, and institutional policy.

1. Emergency and Acute Care
   • Updated after every encounter and intervention.
   • Example: In an ER, a patient with head trauma may have SOAP notes updated multiple times within one shift to reflect neurological status.
2. Inpatient/Hospital Settings
   • Notes should be written at least once per shift and whenever there are significant changes.
   • Multidisciplinary teams (nurses, physicians, therapists) all contribute updates.
3. Outpatient/Primary Care
   • A new SOAP note is written for every visit. Past notes are reviewed for progress comparisons.
   • Example: In a hypertension follow-up, the current SOAP note might review adherence to medication and compare blood pressure readings over time.
4. Chronic Disease and Long-Term Care
   • Notes should capture progress at scheduled follow-ups and after exacerbations.
   • Example: In diabetes management, SOAP notes record HbA1c trends every 3 months and any medication adjustments.
5. Mental Health and Therapy
   • SOAP notes are essential for documenting each session—tracking mood changes, coping strategies, and therapy progress.
   • Example: Subjective: “Patient reports feeling anxious about work.” Objective: “Observed pacing during session.” Assessment: “Generalized Anxiety Disorder.” Plan: “Practice mindfulness exercise; follow-up next week.”
6. Legal, Research, and Quality Assurance
   • SOAP notes may be reviewed during audits, malpractice investigations, or research studies. Accurate and timely charting is crucial for legal protection and quality improvement.
7. Technology and Review Systems
   • Modern EHRs provide reminders, prompts, and checklists to ensure timely updates.
   • Some systems highlight overdue follow-up plans, incomplete sections, or contradictory entries.

Comprehensive Nursing SOAP Note Example

SOAP Notes are most effective when learners see how the framework comes together in a real patient encounter. Examples bridge the gap between theory and practice by showing how subjective complaints, objective findings, nursing diagnoses, and plans integrate into a clear, structured record. By examining and writing SOAP notes, healthcare professionals learn how to apply critical thinking to documentation while also communicating clearly across the care team.

What does a completed SOAP Note look like?

Below is a sample SOAP Note based on the Rebecca Fields 

Rebecca Fields SOAP Note Documentation

Patient: Rebecca Fields
Age: 56 years old
Gender: Female
Date of Assessment: [Current Date]
Time: [Current Time]
Unit: Medical-Surgical Floor, Shadow General Hospital
Nurse: [Student Name], SN
Instructor: [Instructor Name], RN, MSN SUBJECTIVE DATAChief Complaint

Ms. Fields is a 56-year-old female admitted for recovery following a left below-the-knee amputation secondary to a non-healing diabetic foot ulcer. The patient reports experiencing pain rated at 3/10 on a numerical pain scale in her left leg. She describes the pain as intermittent and manageable with current interventions. Current Symptoms and Concerns

The patient states she is “doing fine” overall but expresses significant concerns about adapting to life after amputation. She verbalized anxiety about future mobility and independence, stating, “I’m worried about how I’ll manage at home.” Ms. Fields demonstrates good cognitive function, remaining alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation throughout the assessment.

The patient denies experiencing fever, chills, or fatigue. She reports no chest pain, palpitations, cough, or shortness of breath. There are no complaints of nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. She indicates adequate sleep patterns and appetite since admission. Past Medical History

Ms. Fields has a significant medical history, including:

• Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosed approximately 15 years ago, managed with oral medications and insulin therapy
• Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD): Contributing factor to current amputation
• Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): Managed with medication therapy
• Hypercholesterolemia: Currently treated with statin therapy

Surgical History

The patient underwent a successful left below-the-knee amputation yesterday due to a non-healing diabetic foot ulcer that failed to respond to conservative treatment measures. The surgical procedure was performed without complications. Current Medications

• Dapagliflozin 10 mg PO every morning (SGLT2 inhibitor for diabetes management)
• Glargine insulin 25 units subcutaneously every evening (long-acting insulin)
• Insulin aspart sliding scale subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime:
  • Blood glucose 150-199 mg/dL: 3 units
  • Blood glucose 200-249 mg/dL: 5 units
  • Blood glucose 250-299 mg/dL: 7 units
  • Blood glucose 300-349 mg/dL: 9 units
  • Blood glucose >350 mg/dL: Call physician for dosage
• Aspirin 81 mg PO daily (cardioprotective therapy)
• Rosuvastatin 20 mg PO daily (statin therapy for hypercholesterolemia)

Allergies

NKDA – No known drug allergies. Patient denies all environmental and food allergies. Social History

Ms. Fields lives alone in a single-story home but maintains a strong support system consisting of family members who live nearby. She has arranged to stay with a family member during her initial recovery period. The patient has a significant tobacco history, smoking half a pack of cigarettes daily for 36 years. However, she successfully quit smoking six months ago in preparation for surgery.

Her alcohol consumption is minimal, reporting wine intake 1-2 times per week with 1-2 drinks per sitting. Her last alcoholic drink was six days ago. The patient also reports medical marijuana use, consuming one edible dose monthly for the past couple of months to manage chronic pain. Her last marijuana use was three weeks ago.

Ms. Fields is currently unemployed but previously worked in retail management. She completed high school and has adequate health literacy, demonstrating understanding of her medical conditions and treatment plans. OBJECTIVE DATAVital Signs

• Temperature: 37.1°C (98.8°F) – within normal limits
• Blood Pressure: 134/80 mmHg – slightly elevated (Stage 1 hypertension range)
• Heart Rate: 90 beats per minute – regular rhythm, within normal limits
• Respiratory Rate: 20 breaths per minute – within normal limits
• Oxygen Saturation: 99% on room air – excellent oxygenation

Physical AssessmentGeneral Appearance

Ms. Fields appears comfortable and in no acute distress. She is alert, oriented, and cooperative during the assessment. Her affect is appropriate but shows mild anxiety when discussing future care needs. She maintains good eye contact and responds appropriately to questions. Cardiovascular System

Heart sounds S1 and S2 are audible and distinct with no extra sounds, murmurs, or gallops detected. Regular rhythm with a rate of 90 beats per minute. No peripheral edema noted in the right lower extremity. Capillary refill time is less than 3 seconds in the right foot. Blood pressure is slightly elevated at 134/80 mmHg, consistent with her history of hypertension. Respiratory System

Lung sounds are clear bilaterally in all lung fields with no adventitious sounds such as crackles, wheezes, or rhonchi. Respiratory effort is unlabored with symmetrical chest expansion. No use of accessory muscles observed. The patient demonstrates effective coughing ability. Gastrointestinal System

Bowel sounds are present and normal in all four quadrants. Abdomen is soft, non-tender, and non-distended. The patient reports normal bowel movements and denies any gastrointestinal discomfort. No nausea or vomiting reported. Neurological System

Patient is alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation (A&O x4). Speech is clear and appropriate. Pupil response is equal, round, and reactive to light and accommodation (PERRLA). Upper extremity strength is 5/5 bilaterally. No signs of confusion or cognitive impairment noted. Integumentary System

Skin is warm, dry, and intact with normal turgor. No signs of breakdown or pressure areas noted in accessible areas. Skin color is appropriate for ethnicity with no cyanosis or pallor observed. Surgical Site Assessment

The left lower extremity amputation site shows appropriate post-operative appearance. Surgical markings are present and verified against the medical record and patient identification. The site is covered with appropriate dressing that remains clean, dry, and intact. No visible drainage, erythema, or signs of infection noted. The amputation was performed at the below-knee level as planned. Pain Assessment

Patient rates current pain as 3/10 on a numerical rating scale. She describes the pain as intermittent, aching in quality, located in the left leg (phantom limb sensation). Pain is currently well-controlled with prescribed analgesics. Patient reports pain is worse with position changes and better with rest and medication. Laboratory and Diagnostic Data

Note: Recent laboratory results and diagnostic imaging reports should be included here when available from the medical record. ASSESSMENTNursing Diagnoses (Priority Order)

1. Acute Pain related to surgical amputation as evidenced by patient report of 3/10 pain in left leg and protective behaviors

• Supporting Data: Patient reports pain level of 3/10, recent surgical amputation, requests pain medication
• Expected Outcome: Patient will report pain level of 2/10 or less within 24 hours

2. Disturbed Body Image related to loss of limb as evidenced by patient verbalization of concerns about life after amputation

• Supporting Data: Patient expresses anxiety about future mobility and independence, recent amputation
• Expected Outcome: Patient will verbalize acceptance of altered body image within one week

3. Risk for Infection related to surgical incision and diabetes mellitus

• Supporting Data: Recent surgical procedure, history of diabetes, immunocompromised state
• Expected Outcome: Patient will remain free from signs and symptoms of infection

4. Impaired Physical Mobility related to amputation as evidenced by altered gait and need for assistive devices

• Supporting Data: Recent below-knee amputation, will require prosthetic fitting and gait training
• Expected Outcome: Patient will demonstrate safe mobility with assistive devices within 48 hours

5. Knowledge Deficit related to post-amputation care as evidenced by patient questions about home management

• Supporting Data: Patient expresses concerns about home management, new diagnosis requiring lifestyle changes
• Expected Outcome: Patient will demonstrate understanding of post-amputation care within 48 hours

Medical Diagnoses

• Post-operative status following left below-the-knee amputation secondary to non-healing diabetic foot ulcer – currently stable
• Type II Diabetes Mellitus – stable on current medication regimen, requiring continued glucose monitoring
• Stage 1 Hypertension – requires monitoring and possible medication adjustment
• Peripheral Vascular Disease – ongoing condition requiring management
• Coronary Artery Disease – stable on current cardiac medications

PLANNursing InterventionsPain Management

• Assess pain level using 0-10 numerical rating scale every 2-4 hours and PRN
• Administer prescribed analgesics as ordered and evaluate effectiveness
• Implement non-pharmacological comfort measures including positioning, relaxation techniques, and distraction
• Educate patient on phantom limb sensation and management strategies
• Monitor for signs of breakthrough pain and notify physician if pain exceeds 5/10

Surgical Site Care

• Assess amputation site every shift for signs of infection (redness, swelling, drainage, increased warmth)
• Maintain sterile technique during dressing changes per physician orders
• Monitor and document wound healing progress
• Educate patient and family on proper wound care techniques
• Ensure proper positioning to prevent contractures

Infection Prevention

• Monitor vital signs every 4 hours with attention to temperature trends
• Assess white blood cell count and other infection markers as ordered
• Maintain strict hand hygiene and standard precautions
• Educate patient on signs and symptoms of infection to report
• Ensure adequate nutrition to support healing

Mobility and Rehabilitation

• Consult physical therapy for mobility assessment and rehabilitation planning
• Encourage early mobilization as tolerated and per physician orders
• Assist with transfers and ambulation using appropriate safety measures
• Begin patient education regarding future prosthetic use
• Prevent complications of immobility through range of motion exercises

Psychosocial Support

• Provide emotional support and therapeutic communication
• Allow patient to express concerns and feelings about amputation
• Arrange social work consultation for coping strategies and community resources
• Consider referral to support groups for amputees
• Include family in education and support sessions

Diabetes Management

• Monitor blood glucose levels as per sliding scale protocol
• Administer insulin as ordered and document blood glucose responses
• Coordinate with dietitian for nutritional counseling
• Educate on importance of glucose control for wound healing
• Monitor for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia

Patient and Family Education

• Provide comprehensive education on post-amputation care
• Discuss prosthetic options and rehabilitation timeline
• Reinforce diabetes management strategies
• Educate on signs and symptoms requiring immediate medical attention
• Provide written educational materials for reference

Interdisciplinary CollaborationPhysician Communication

Notify physician immediately if:

• Pain level exceeds 5/10 despite interventions
• Signs of surgical site infection develop
• Vital signs indicate instability
• Blood glucose levels become difficult to control
• Patient develops complications

Consultations Required

• Social Work: Assessment for psychosocial support, coping strategies, and community resource coordination
• Physical Therapy: Mobility assessment, strength evaluation, and rehabilitation planning
• Occupational Therapy: Activities of daily living assessment and adaptive equipment needs
• Dietitian: Nutritional assessment and diabetes management optimization
• Prosthetist: Future prosthetic evaluation and fitting (when appropriate)

Discharge Planning Considerations

• Coordinate with family support system for post-discharge care arrangements
• Arrange home health services for wound care and diabetes management
• Schedule follow-up appointments with surgeon, primary care physician, and specialists
• Ensure patient has necessary medical equipment and supplies
• Verify insurance coverage for prosthetic devices and rehabilitation services

Monitoring and Evaluation

• Reassess nursing diagnoses and interventions every 8 hours
• Document patient progress toward expected outcomes
• Modify care plan based on patient response and changing needs
• Ensure continuity of care through comprehensive shift reports
• Evaluate effectiveness of pain management and adjust as needed

EVALUATION

The patient’s current condition is stable with manageable pain levels and no immediate complications. Ms. Fields demonstrates good understanding of her medical conditions but requires continued education and support regarding post-amputation care. Her strong family support system and previous motivation to quit smoking indicate good potential for successful rehabilitation.

Priority areas for continued focus include pain management, infection prevention, emotional support for body image adaptation, and comprehensive discharge planning to ensure successful transition to home care.

Nurse Signature: _________________________, SN
Date: _________________
Time: _________________
Instructor Review: _________________________, RN, MSN References:

Ackley, B. J., Ladwig, G. B., Makic, M. B. F., Martinez-Kratz, M., & Zanotti, M. (2020). Nursing diagnosis handbook: An evidence-based guide to planning care (12th ed.). Elsevier.

Herdman, T. H., Kamitsuru, S., & Lopes, C. T. (2021). NANDA International nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification 2021-2023 (12th ed.). Thieme.

Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P. A., & Hall, A. M. (2021). Fundamentals of nursing (10th ed.). Elsevier.

How can an example clarify the use of the template?

A completed SOAP note shows how theoretical knowledge transforms into structured documentation. Instead of abstract instructions like “separate subjective from objective,” learners see precisely how:

• Patient-reported pain (Subjective) aligns with objective surgical findings.
• Concerns about independence (Subjective) connect to body image diagnosis.
• Measurable outcomes (Objective vitals, surgical site appearance) inform the plan of care.

By following an example, students learn logical flow, professional language, and how to support nursing diagnoses with evidence.

What lessons can be learned from analyzing a sample SOAP note?

• Clarity and Precision: Avoid vague terms; use measurable descriptors.
• Holistic Approach: Good SOAP notes integrate physical, psychological, and social data.
• Critical Thinking: Diagnoses flow logically from assessment; plans are evidence-based.
• Interdisciplinary Care: Documentation highlights when collaboration is necessary.
• Legal and Professional Standards: A well-structured SOAP note ensures compliance and continuity of care.

How to Improve SOAP Note Charting Skills

Improving SOAP note charting is both an individual skill development task and an organizational quality-improvement project. The most effective programs combine deliberate practice, model notes, structured feedback (audit + feedback), and system supports (templates, EHR prompts, CDI teams). Below I break this into concrete, actionable parts so learners and leaders can implement immediate changes that produce measurable improvement.

1) Individual skill development — concrete, high-yield practices

These techniques are practical and evidence-based — use them in daily practice or teaching sessions.

• Deliberate practice with micro-goals.
  Break practice into short focused drills (10–12 minutes) that target one skill at a time: e.g., write five concise Assessments linked explicitly to S/O data; next day focus on writing actionable Plans with red-flag language. Time-limited practice trains brevity and prioritization. (Useful in busy clinics.) 
• Use model notes + annotated examples.
  Compare your note to a scored, annotated exemplar that explains why each line belongs in S, O, A or P. Replace vague phrasing with measurable language (e.g., “pain reduced 8→3/10 after 2 mg IV morphine” instead of “patient improved”). Studies show annotated, example-driven learning improves note quality. 
• Apply a short rubric for self-audit.
  Score your own notes on 6–8 items (identifiers, clear CC, S vs O separation, assessment supported by evidence, plan actionable/explicit, signature/timestamp). Tally and set one micro-target for the next week. Rubrics produce faster improvement than unguided practice. 
• Chart-stimulated recall (CSR).
  After writing a note, use CSR: review the chart with a supervisor and explain your reasoning. CSR reveals gaps between what you thought and what you wrote and is a validated teaching/assessment tool. 
• Simulated encounters & OSCE practice.
  Practice SOAP charting immediately after standardized patient encounters. Doing the note while the encounter is fresh improves accuracy and teaches prioritization under time pressure. MedEdPORTAL curricula often include such exercises for lasting skills transfer. 
• Deliberate re-writing.
  Write a full narrative SOAP for learning, then condense it to a 6–8 line working note that would fit in a busy chart. This builds the skill of translating comprehensive thinking into a concise, usable progress note.

2) Training resources and programs (what to use now)

Use a mix of short modules, case-based curricula, and organizational toolkits.

• Interactive e-modules & short online courses.
  Peer-reviewed studies show interactive online modules improve students’ ability to write clinically appropriate SOAP notes and retain those skills better than lecture alone. Use 20–60 minute modules before practice sessions. 
• MedEdPORTAL curricula & small-group cases.
  MedEdPORTAL publishes practical SOAP-note teaching packages (vignettes, facilitator guides, rubrics) ready for small-group sessions or workshops. These are ideal for medical and nursing education. 
• Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) toolkits.
  AHIMA’s CDI toolkits provide institution-level guidance on documentation standards, audit workflows, and role definitions — essential when scaling improvement across units. Use these to build governance, query rules, and reporting. 
• AHRQ resources for handoffs & communication.
  Handoff tools like I-PASS and SBAR standardize what to communicate and how; they dovetail with SOAP note training by making plan & contingency language explicit in documentation. 
• Workshops + mentored charting.
  Short (1–3 hour) workshops with direct observation and immediate feedback, embedded in morning report or rounds, drive fast improvement — especially when followed by audit cycles. 

3) Turnkey 4-week training pathway (ready to run)

Week 1 — Foundations: 20–30 min e-module (SOAP structure + good/bad examples) + rubric distribution. 
Week 2 — Supervised practice: two 45-min sessions (3 timed cases per session) with immediate instructor feedback. Use model notes. 
Week 3 — Peer review: submit one de-identified note, group review with rubric (30–45 min). Rotate facilitators. 
Week 4 — Audit & feedback: audit 10 charts, provide individualized written feedback + 1:1 coaching; set measurable goals for next cycle (process metrics below). 

4) Peer review — structure that actually improves documentation

Peer review works best when it’s regular, structured, supportive, and data-driven.

A practical peer-review workflow (weekly or biweekly):

1. Selection: Randomly sample 5–10 de-identified notes from the team’s recent work.
2. Shared rubric: Apply the same 6–8 item rubric used in training (see sample below).
3. Facilitated meeting (30–60 min): Discuss 1–2 notes in depth — highlight strengths, gaps, and exact rewrites. Rotate facilitator role to build ownership.
4. Action items: Each author gets 1–2 concrete actions to apply (e.g., “explicitly document vitals in Objective and add contingency in Plan”).
5. Trend reporting: Track top 3 issues monthly (e.g., weak Plans, missing vitals) and produce a 1-page tip sheet. Quality improvement projects using guided peer review have produced sustained improvements when the process was non-punitive and continuous. 

Benefits: peer review exposes writers to alternative phrasing and clinical reasoning; it normalizes improvement; it builds shared language across disciplines.

5) Feedback — how to make it work (specifics that change behavior)

Audit + feedback is an evidence-based way to change clinician behavior — but its effectiveness depends on how feedback is delivered. Cochrane reviews show small-to-moderate effects overall, larger when baseline performance is low and when feedback is repeated and actionable. 

Principles of effective feedback for SOAP notes

• Timely: within 24–72 hours of charting (same day if possible).
• Specific: point to exact lines and suggest rephrasing (don’t say “be clearer”).
• Actionable: give one short rewrite or a checklist item to apply next time.
• Credible source: delivered by a respected peer, educator, or CDI specialist.
• Iterative: repeated cycles with measurable goals (audit + feedback).

Sample feedback (concrete):

• Weak: “Assessment unclear.”
• Effective: “Assessment: ‘Possible UTI’ — add 2 supporting sentences: dysuria x2 days (S), temp 38.2°C (O), UA positive for leukocyte esterase (O). Recommend starting nitrofurantoin and plan for urine culture results in 48 hours.”

Formats that work: one-on-one coaching, annotated electronic comments, group debriefs, and dashboard reports from the EHR that highlight missing items (e.g., no documented follow-up). 

6) Measurement: what to track (process + quality metrics)

Use both simple process metrics and deeper quality audits.

Process (easy, frequent):

• Percent of notes that include all four SOAP sections.
• Time-to-note (median hours from encounter to completed note).
• Percent of notes using the institutional template.
• Percent notes with explicit follow-up/contingency plans.

Quality (sample audits monthly):

• Rubric score average (0–20 scale) across audited notes.
• Concordance score: does the Assessment logically follow S & O?
• Documentation-related safety issues (missed red flags, delayed follow-up).

Automated dashboards in modern EHRs can generate many of these measures; use audits for the deeper, interpretive checks. Studies show structured documentation + templates improve measurable note quality without increasing charting time when implemented thoughtfully. 

7) System supports that multiply individual effort

• Robust templates & smart phrases. Templates reduce omissions and speed documentation; pair them with training to avoid generic, copy-pasted text. Evidence shows well-designed templates improve documentation quality. 
• CDI teams and governance. A CDI program (AHIMA toolkits) provides policies, query workflows, and audit capacity needed for sustainable improvement. 
• EHR decision support and dashboards. Use prompts for missing vitals, required problem lists, and follow-up fields; couple automated alerts with human coaching. Integrating documentation standards into workflows keeps notes usable and compliant. 
• Protected time for peer review & training. Organizations that schedule short (30–60 min) regular slots for documentation practice see better uptake and sustained gains. 

8) Sample SOAP-note rubric (use in peer review or self-audit)

Score each item 0–2 (0 = missing/poor, 1 = partial, 2 = good). Total = 0–12.

1. Identifiers & Date/Time/Signature — presence and accuracy.
2. Subjective — clear chief complaint, relevant HPI, meds/allergies noted.
3. Objective — vitals present, focused exam, key labs/images documented.
4. Assessment — prioritized diagnosis or problem list with brief rationale linking S/O.
5. Plan — specific interventions, diagnostics, education, follow-up & red flags.
6. Clarity & Brevity — concise language, avoids vague terms and excessive copy-paste.

Use rubric thresholds: 10–12 = excellent; 7–9 = needs minor improvement; <7 = target for coaching.

9) Sample peer-review session agenda (30 minutes)

1. 2 min — Introduce the note (de-identified).
2. 10 min — Author reads note; peers silently score with rubric.
3. 10 min — Facilitated discussion: strengths, 2 areas to improve, rewrite one problematic sentence together.
4. 8 min — Author commits to 1–2 actions; facilitator logs trend items.

10) Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Pitfall: Overreliance on template text → bland, non-specific notes.
  Fix: Teach customization: require 1–2 original sentences in Assessment and Plan linking S/O to treatment. 
• Pitfall: Delayed documentation → memory errors.
  Fix: Set expectation: document within 24 hours; use quick “work-in-progress” notes if interrupted. 
• Pitfall: Vague Plans with no contingency.
  Fix: Make contingency language mandatory (e.g., “Return for worsening pain, fever >38°C, or new weakness”). 

11) Key evidence & practical references (for your article’s resources box)

• Cochrane / Ivers et al. — Audit & feedback is effective in improving professional practice (small-to-moderate effects). 
• AHRQ — Handoff tools (I-PASS, SBAR) and handoff guidance — useful when aligning documentation and communication. 
• AHIMA — Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) toolkits and education resources for institutional programs. 
• MedEdPORTAL — case-based SOAP curricula and teaching materials for students and residents. 
• Evidence that interactive online teaching modules and structured templates improve SOAP note writing and documentation quality.
• Chart-Stimulated Recall (CSR) resources and studies — validated for teaching and assessing documentation & clinical reasoning. 

Conclusion

SOAP note charting has established itself as one of the most effective and enduring methods of clinical documentation, offering healthcare professionals a structured and reliable way to capture patient encounters. Beyond simply recording data, this framework creates a narrative of care that connects symptoms, observations, assessments, and interventions into a coherent plan. The long-term benefits of effective SOAP note use are evident not only in continuity of care but also in improved interdisciplinary communication, reduced errors, and stronger foundations for evidence-based practice. When clinicians adhere to clear and concise note-taking, they create medical records that serve as valuable references for treatment planning, monitoring progress, and evaluating outcomes over time.

The impact of SOAP note documentation on patient outcomes is equally significant. By ensuring that each subjective and objective detail is carefully recorded and analyzed, healthcare providers can formulate accurate differential diagnoses and tailor treatment plans to meet individual needs. This systematic approach strengthens clinical decision-making, supports early detection of complications, and facilitates measurable improvements in patient care. Moreover, SOAP notes provide legal and professional safeguards by ensuring thorough documentation of the care process, protecting both the patient and the health professional.

Looking ahead, future trends in SOAP note charting point toward even greater integration of technology. Digital templates, AI-powered documentation tools, and electronic health record systems are expected to streamline the documentation process, reduce the administrative burden, and enhance accuracy. These advancements will not only make SOAP notes easier to complete but also allow for real-time data analysis, helping healthcare professionals anticipate patient needs and design more effective interventions. As healthcare environments continue to evolve, the SOAP framework will remain a vital tool—adaptable, reliable, and essential for guiding patient care.

Ultimately, mastering SOAP note writing is not just about fulfilling documentation requirements; it is about reinforcing a culture of precision, accountability, and collaboration. When effectively used, SOAP notes provide the roadmap for safe, high-quality, and patient-centered care, ensuring that every entry in the medical record contributes to better outcomes today and stronger systems of care for the future.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the SOAP method for charting?

The SOAP method is a structured format for documenting patient progress notes in healthcare. It organizes information into Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan, making charting consistent and clear.

How to do SOAP charting?

To do SOAP charting, healthcare professionals gather patient-reported information (Subjective), record measurable data (Objective), analyze findings (Assessment), and outline treatment or follow-up steps (Plan).

How to properly write SOAP notes?

Proper SOAP notes should be concise, accurate, and organized, capturing essential patient details. Use patient quotes in the Subjective section, factual data in Objective, professional judgment in Assessment, and specific interventions in Plan.

What is the meaning of SOAP charting?

SOAP charting refers to the use of the SOAP format to document patient encounters systematically, ensuring that communication among healthcare providers is clear, professional, and focused on patient care.