Nursing Peer Review Examples and Tips

Nursing peer review is a cornerstone of professional accountability, driving both individual growth and systemic improvement in healthcare settings. Just as clinical pathways guide patient treatment plans, peer review provides nurses with a structured method to evaluate each other’s practice, identify strengths, and highlight opportunities for improvement. Far from being a punitive process, effective peer review fosters a culture of continuous learning, collaboration, and shared responsibility for excellence in patient care.

At its core, the nursing peer review process is about professional development, ensuring that care delivery aligns with clinical standards, ethical guidelines, and institutional expectations. It offers a formalized approach to providing constructive feedback—feedback that is not only actionable but also rooted in mutual respect and evidence-based practice. When implemented effectively, peer reviews drive performance and enhance communication skills, helping nurses navigate complex clinical environments with greater clarity and confidence.

This guide offers a comprehensive overview of nursing peer review, from fundamental definitions and guiding principles to specific examples in diverse clinical specialties. Whether you’re a new RN preparing to receive feedback for the first time, a charge nurse facilitating performance evaluations, or part of an organizational team aiming to improve your unit’s feedback culture, you’ll find examples and tips to strengthen your approach. We’ll explore best practices for giving and receiving peer feedback, peer review templates, case studies, and tools that support collaborative and constructive peer review feedback.

By understanding the peer review process and integrating it into daily practice, nurses can reinforce a positive work environment, enhance patient outcomes, and elevate the standard of nursing care. Ultimately, peer review is not just about critique—it’s about helping others grow, highlighting strengths, and sustaining a collective commitment to excellence in the nursing profession.

What is Nursing Peer Review?

Nursing peer review is a formal, collaborative process by which nurses evaluate the performance and clinical decision-making of other nurses. It is based on established professional standards, institutional policies, and evidence-based practices. Unlike traditional performance appraisals conducted by supervisors, nursing peer review is performed by individuals of similar roles and rank—typically other registered nurses (RNs). Its primary goal is to ensure accountability, support continuous learning, and improve the overall work environment through structured peer feedback.

This review process is not just an evaluation tool—it is a professional obligation grounded in ethical practice and the promotion of excellence in nursing care. Peer review is used to assess clinical behaviors, documentation accuracy, adherence to protocols, communication with clients and colleagues, and patient safety measures.

Example: A medical-surgical unit may assign nurses to conduct peer reviews during shift handoffs. One nurse might observe another’s IV insertion technique or pressure ulcer documentation and complete a peer review template capturing observed strengths, areas for improvement, and actionable suggestions. This structured method ensures the feedback process is objective and practice-focused, not personal.

The American Nurses Association (ANA) defines peer review as “an organized effort whereby practicing professionals review the quality and safety of care provided by their peers.” The peer review process is thus an essential component of professional development and an integral part of quality assurance in modern healthcare systems.

Why is Peer Review Important in Nursing?

Nursing peer review is vital for numerous reasons, each contributing to the individual nurse’s growth, the team’s effectiveness, and ultimately, patient care outcomes. Its importance can be broken down into several interdependent dimensions:

1. Promotes a Culture of Accountability and Excellence

Peer review ensures nurses uphold professional standards by monitoring their own and others’ performance. By encouraging positive peer feedback and self-reflection, peer review strengthens a nurse’s accountability to the profession, the healthcare institution, and the patients. This shared responsibility promotes a culture of continuous improvement where feedback provides opportunities rather than criticisms.

2. Encourages Constructive, Actionable Feedback

Unlike top-down feedback, constructive peer evaluation is built on mutual respect. Peers are often more familiar with the complexities and nuances of the tasks at hand. This makes their feedback more actionable, insightful, and relevant. For example, a nurse might say, “I noticed you maintained sterile technique throughout the dressing change. One way to improve might be to double-check your time labels on IV tubing,”—offering both positive feedback and an area of improvement.

3. Supports Safe, Evidence-Based Patient Care

Effective peer reviews identify lapses in safety protocols and help correct errors early—before they result in adverse outcomes. In this way, peer review directly supports safer, more consistent, and higher-quality nursing and patient care. It’s also a vital tool in performance improvement initiatives aimed at reducing hospital-acquired infections or readmission rates.

4. Enhances Professional Development

Participating in peer reviews helps nurses develop critical soft skills such as communication, reflection, decision-making, and time management skills. Learning to give constructive and receive feedback fosters emotional intelligence, humility, and leadership readiness—qualities crucial for both clinical and administrative roles.

5. Promotes Team Cohesion

Peer review reinforces team-building nursing peer review principles by cultivating respect, trust, and shared goals. Regular giving feedback sessions contribute to a positive work environment where nurses are empowered to learn from one another and celebrate achievements as a team.

How Does Peer Review Benefit Nurses and Patients?

When implemented effectively, the peer review process produces tangible benefits for both healthcare providers and the people they serve. These benefits are not abstract—they are measurable outcomes tied directly to performance management, patient satisfaction, and system-wide excellence.

Benefits for Nurses:

• Skill Development: Nurses improve attention to detail, documentation, clinical judgment, and ability to meet deadlines under pressure.
• Confidence Building: Receiving validation for well-performed duties builds professional confidence, especially when reinforced with positive peer feedback.
• Insight into Growth Opportunities: Peer review helps identify blind spots. For example, a review example might point out inconsistent charting—a key insight a nurse can work on through self-evaluation and training.
• Career Advancement: Participation in peer review is often a marker of leadership readiness and supports long-term nursing career progression.

Benefits for Patients:

• Improved Safety and Quality: Peer review leads to timely detection and correction of unsafe practices, ensuring the delivery of high-quality nursing practice.
• Consistency in Care Delivery: Nurses who receive regular peer feedback are more consistent in applying policies, evidence-based interventions, and treatment protocols.
• Enhanced Patient Experience: When nurses communicate better, delegate effectively, and function as a team player, patients experience smoother care transitions and improved outcomes.

Case in Point: In a Texas hospital, a peer review program focusing on delegation of tasks and bedside manner led to measurable improvements in patient satisfaction scores, while also reducing medication errors by 12% over six months.

What Are the Key Components of a Nursing Peer Review?

A successful nursing peer review process is guided by several key components. Each of these elements ensures the process remains fair, relevant, and capable of driving meaningful change:

1. Clear Criteria and Standards

Peer reviews should be guided by objective criteria such as clinical protocols, scope of practice standards, and institutional benchmarks. This ensures reviews are consistent, defendable, and rooted in professional norms. Review templates should reflect competencies like clinical performance, documentation, communication skills, and adherence to safety protocols.

2. Qualified Peer Reviewers

Only nurses with similar roles, responsibilities, and credentials should conduct the review. A nurse cannot write a peer review for someone outside their scope or specialty. This peer-to-peer structure reinforces equity and credibility.

3. Timely and Routine Reviews

Effective peer review should be timely—not just during annual performance evaluations, but also during orientation, after critical incidents, or as part of continuous learning initiatives. Timely reviews ensure that feedback is relevant, and the person receiving the feedback can act on it.

4. Confidentiality and Integrity

All peer reviews must be conducted with a strong commitment to confidentiality and non-retaliation. Trust is essential for honest reflection, particularly when sharing examples of constructive peer feedback or pointing out areas of improvement.

5. Constructive Feedback with Action Plans

Whether offering praise or critique, feedback must be specific and paired with actionable steps. “You’re doing well” is too vague, but “You explained discharge instructions clearly, which showed strong communication skills—just remember to double-check for teach-back understanding” is both positive and instructive.

6. Documentation and Tracking

The use of peer review templates, logs, and data dashboards helps document trends, monitor performance over time, and align review efforts with broader organizational goals.

7. Opportunities for Self-Reflection

Many institutions now include a self-evaluation step in the peer review cycle. This allows the nurse to reflect on their own strengths and weaknesses, preparing them to receive feedback with openness and maturity.

What Are Some Effective Nursing Peer Review Examples?

Effective nursing peer review involves more than checking boxes on an evaluation form—it is a reflective, evidence-based practice rooted in collaboration, professional development, and continuous improvement. A well-designed peer review process enhances nursing care, helps identify areas of improvement, and reinforces a nurse’s accountability to both peers and patients. Below are real-world peer review examples that demonstrate how this process works in action:

1. Real-Time Feedback on Infection Control Practices

In a busy emergency department, a nurse observed a colleague briefly breaking sterile technique while inserting a Foley catheter. Instead of reprimanding the RN in front of others, the observing nurse documented the concern using a standardized peer review template and followed up privately during their shift. The feedback provided was timely and constructive, with suggestions such as, “Remember to change gloves between prepping and insertion.” The nurse receiving the feedback appreciated the tactful, actionable input and improved practice going forward.

This is a classic example of constructive peer review feedback, which encourages self-evaluation without causing defensiveness. The review focused on the work environment, patient safety, and continuous learning—not personal failure.

2. Peer Review to Enhance Time Management

On a medical-surgical floor, peer review was implemented to address chronic issues around missed medication times. Nurses were paired weekly and observed one another’s workflows, using a review template to record observations related to time management, delegation of tasks, and communication. One review noted:

“Jessica prioritized high-risk patients effectively during morning rounds and delegated non-critical tasks efficiently. Consider scheduling time for double-checking MAR entries before midday to reduce errors.”

This review highlighted strengths while gently pointing to an area for improvement. The feedback was positive, actionable, and led to a measurable reduction in delayed med administrations.

3. Team-Building Through Peer Recognition

At a pediatric unit, peer reviews included a “strengths spotlight” where team members provided constructive feedback and positive peer feedback to recognize exemplary behaviors. One RN wrote:

“Maria went above and beyond with a distressed parent by calmly explaining every step of the IV placement. Her empathy and clinical confidence created a calming effect that benefited both the child and parent.”

This practice fostered a positive work environment, promoted feedback culture, and strengthened interpersonal relationships among nursing staff.

Can You Provide Examples of Peer Review in Different Nursing Specialties?

The peer review process is versatile—it can be adapted across specialties to improve discipline-specific care and support professional development. Below are examples from distinct nursing areas:

1. Critical Care Nursing

In ICU settings, decisions must be made rapidly. Peer reviews here focus on decision-making, adherence to safety protocols, and crisis communication. For instance, a critical care nurse might be reviewed on how they handled ventilator alarms or responded to sudden patient decompensation. A peer might suggest improving documentation or quicker escalation protocols.

2. Emergency Nursing

ER nurses often receive peer feedback on triage accuracy, efficiency under pressure, and trauma response. Reviews may include feedback like:

“Improve clarity in SBAR handoffs to ensure seamless team transitions between shifts.”

This is especially important in high-stakes, fast-paced environments where communication failures can lead to errors.

3. Maternity and Neonatal Nursing

In maternal care units, peer review focuses on fetal monitoring interpretation, labor progression documentation, and patient teaching. A common feedback example may be:

“Consider reinforcing discharge instructions on newborn jaundice during earlier postpartum rounds to ensure retention.”

Such insights improve both patient education and clinical outcomes.

4. Psychiatric Nursing

In mental health units, peer reviews emphasize communication skills, de-escalation techniques, and boundary setting. A constructive peer review might state:

“Your calm demeanor de-escalated a tense moment during group therapy. Consider documenting patient’s affect more thoroughly to support care continuity.”

These examples show how peer review promotes nursing and patient outcomes by recognizing specific examples of clinical behavior and suggesting actionable refinements.

What Are Some Case Studies Illustrating Successful Peer Reviews?

Case Study 1: Peer Review Embedded in Unit Culture

At a Magnet-designated hospital in Texas, nurse leaders introduced unit-based peer review processes as part of the broader performance review structure. Every quarter, staff nurses reviewed a randomly selected peer’s chart for documentation quality, safety checks, and alignment with best practices.

This system led to:

• A 22% increase in documentation accuracy
• Enhanced compliance with medication reconciliation protocols
• Stronger peer feedback processes and trust among staff

The case illustrates how structured peer review can elevate employee performance while encouraging open to feedback behaviors.

Case Study 2: Advanced Practice Peer Review

In a university hospital’s advanced practice unit, nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists conducted peer-to-peer reviews of diagnostic and prescribing practices. A critical element was the use of de-identified case studies, reviewed monthly in committee. When errors or practice deviations occurred, the feedback provided was constructive, confidential, and focused on shared learning—not punishment.

Outcomes included:

• Reduced diagnostic errors in outpatient settings
• Improved referral appropriateness
• Strengthened interprofessional collaboration

This shows how peer review supports performance management, risk reduction, and commitment to excellence.

How Can Peer Review Be Adapted for Various Clinical Settings?

The strength of the nursing peer review model lies in its adaptability. Here’s how different clinical environments have customized the review process:

1. Inpatient Units

In med-surg or telemetry units, peer reviews are often performed at the point of care using real-time observation and quick chart audits. These settings benefit from:

• Standard review templates focused on documentation, infection control, and pain management
• Shift-based peer pairing for mutual reviews
• Built-in time during handoffs for review discussions

2. Outpatient Clinics

With shorter patient interactions, outpatient peer reviews may focus on:

• Patient education delivery
• Efficiency in scheduling and follow-up coordination
• Use of EMR and attention to detail in charting

Reviews here are typically monthly and may be embedded into routine quality assurance meetings.

3. Long-Term Care Facilities

Peer reviews in LTC centers emphasize:

• Interpersonal skills with residents
• Timely medication administration
• Collaborative care planning with families

This setting benefits from mentoring-based peer reviews, where experienced nurses offer constructive insights to newer staff.

4. High-Acuity or Specialized Units

Units like oncology or cardiac cath labs often integrate peer reviews into morbidity and mortality rounds or case debriefs. Advanced peer reviews here analyze:

• Critical thinking under pressure
• Delegation of tasks during high-volume periods
• Compliance with disease-specific protocols

Digital tools, such as peer review dashboards or EHR-integrated forms, further streamline the evaluation process.

How to Conduct a Nursing Peer Review?

A well-executed nursing peer review is more than a formality—it’s a structured, evidence-based approach to promoting professional development, maintaining accountability, and improving nursing care. Peer review not only helps nurses refine their clinical judgment but also fosters a feedback culture and a positive work environment centered on continuous learning.

What Is the Goal?

The overarching aim of the peer review process is to provide constructive feedback grounded in professional standards, while encouraging a respectful exchange among colleagues. It focuses on what happened, why, and how to improve—not on assigning blame.

What Steps Should Be Followed During the Peer Review Process?

Conducting an effective peer review involves a structured and objective approach. Below are the key steps typically followed in high-functioning healthcare settings:

Step 1: Establish the Purpose and Scope

Clearly define what the peer review will evaluate—e.g., documentation quality, communication effectiveness, delegation of tasks, or adherence to clinical protocols. Consider whether the review is for routine quality assurance, performance improvement, or incident response.

📌 Example: A unit might initiate peer reviews after observing inconsistent documentation in pain assessments.

Step 2: Select the Peer Reviewers

Reviewers should be clinical peers—nurses of similar rank or specialty, ideally with experience and neutrality. They must be trained in providing feedback constructively and maintaining confidentiality.

Step 3: Gather Objective Data

Use multiple sources to inform the review:

• Electronic health records (EHR)
• Direct observations
• Incident reports or patient complaints
• Self-reflections from the nurse under review

Objective data ensures that the review is fair and rooted in facts rather than opinions or workplace dynamics.

Step 4: Use a Standardized Peer Review Template

A consistent review template helps streamline the evaluation process. It may include:

• Specific performance criteria
• Strengths and areas for improvement
• Clinical reasoning and patient interaction
• Communication and teamwork skills

Templates also support legal defensibility and documentation accuracy.

Step 5: Conduct the Review

The review may be done asynchronously (e.g., reviewing documentation) or during live shadowing. Reviewers assess employee performance using clinical standards and unit protocols.

They should be:

• Open to feedback themselves
• Respectful, professional, and unbiased
• Focused on nursing care, not personality traits

Step 6: Prepare the Feedback Report

Compile a written summary with balanced, constructive peer review feedback. Include:

• Examples of strong performance
• Specific, actionable improvement suggestions
• Encouragement and professional respect

Avoid generalizations like “always” or “never,” and instead use evidence-based observations.

Step 7: Deliver Feedback in a Constructive Manner

Effective feedback delivery is the cornerstone of a successful peer review. Schedule a confidential, one-on-one discussion, or use a feedback form followed by optional debrief.

What Criteria Should Be Used to Evaluate Nursing Performance?

The evaluation process should be aligned with:

• Standards of Nursing Practice (e.g., ANA, NMC, local board guidelines)
• Institutional policies and protocols
• The nurse’s role and scope of practice

Core Evaluation Criteria:

Category	Key Aspects to Evaluate
Clinical Competence	Assessment accuracy, medication safety, use of protocols
Critical Thinking	Prioritization, decision-making in complex scenarios
Communication	Clarity in SBAR, interprofessional teamwork, empathy with patients
Documentation	Completeness, timeliness, legal accuracy
Professionalism	Ethics, accountability, adherence to standards of care
Time Management	Workflow efficiency, task prioritization, appropriate delegation of tasks
Patient-Centered Care	Respect, cultural competence, education, and support for self-management
Team Collaboration	Positive interactions, conflict resolution, shared decision-making

📌 Example: A review comment might read,
“Consistently completes wound assessments with detailed notes and adheres to pressure ulcer prevention protocols. Consider enhancing clarity when documenting pain reassessment intervals.”

This kind of peer feedback example is specific, respectful, and actionable.

How Can Feedback Be Delivered Effectively and Constructively?

1. Start with Strengths

Lead with what the nurse is doing well. Recognizing good practice improves receptiveness and creates a psychologically safe space for the rest of the conversation.

✅ Example: “Your patient handoffs are exceptionally clear and organized, which helps the team stay on the same page.”

2. Be Specific and Objective

Avoid vague criticisms. Use data, direct quotes from documentation, or observable behavior. Frame feedback around actions, not character.

❌ “You’re not good at multitasking.”
✅ “There was a delay in administering meds during a double-code situation. Consider triaging tasks and requesting support more quickly next time.”

3. Use Constructive Language

Language should promote growth. Focus on improvement rather than judgment.

• “Consider…”
• “It may be helpful to…”
• “One opportunity to strengthen your practice could be…”

This reduces defensiveness and fosters a growth mindset.

4. Encourage Self-Reflection

Ask open-ended questions like:

• “How do you feel about how that situation went?”
• “What would you do differently next time?”

This supports peer-to-peer coaching and builds accountability.

5. Maintain Confidentiality

All peer reviews should remain private to protect trust and avoid workplace tension. In some settings, anonymized reviews may also be used.

What Challenges Do Nurses Face in Peer Review?

Common Barriers That Can Affect the Peer Review Process

Even though peer feedback and the peer review process are powerful tools for professional growth, they often encounter obstacles that limit their effectiveness:

• Time Constraints & Workload Pressures
  Nurses juggle heavy clinical responsibilities, leaving little time for reflective evaluation or structured feedback sessions. Across multiple studies, insufficient time to engage with new processes or projects—including peer review—was consistently one of the highest-rated barriers. 
• Lack of Role Authority and Organizational Support
  Many nurses report limited autonomy to initiate performance improvement, change procedures, or advocate for process enhancements. Without managerial or institutional backing, peer review risks becoming a purely theoretical activity. 
• Inconsistent Criteria & Subjectivity
  Without standardized evaluation tools or shared rubrics, peer reviews become variable, creating perceptions of unfairness or bias. This lack of consistency can undermine trust in the process. 
• Resistance to Feedback
  Some nurses may view peer feedback as personal criticism, rather than growth-oriented. Role duality—where one is both peer reviewer and reviewee—can invoke defensiveness or strategic behavior that compromises openness. 

How Can Nurses Overcome Resistance to Peer Review?

Here are evidence-informed strategies to address and reduce resistance:

• Embed Peer Review in Workflow
  Integrate feedback examples into daily routines—like quick bedside reflections or shift handoff discussions—so the process feels natural and supportive rather than extra. 
• Leadership Modeling and Support
  Nurse leaders and managers can legitimize peer review by celebrating its impact, allocating time, and recognizing reviewers—helping to build a feedback culture and positive review process reputation. 
• Provide Training and Mentorship
  Role-plays, coaching, or workshops on giving and receiving constructive feedback can enhance skills and reduce anxiety. Peer mentorship helps normalize the process and cultivate psychological safety.
• Use Structured, Transparent Tools
  Implement peer review templates with clear evaluation criteria to ensure consistency and fairness. Reviewing becomes less subjective and more focused on shared standards and specific examples. 
• Promote Non-Punitive, Developmental Mindsets
  Frame peer review as a professional development opportunity—not a formal performance appraisal or disciplinary tool. Acknowledging positive peer feedback alongside areas for improvement fosters engagement and trust.

What Are the Ethical Considerations in Conducting Peer Reviews?

Ensuring ethical integrity in peer review is essential to uphold professionalism, trust, and fairness in nursing practice:

• Conflicts of Interest and Bias
  Reviewers should disclose any personal or professional relationships that may bias their judgment—and recuse themselves if necessary. Transparency safeguards the objectivity and credibility of the review. 
• Confidentiality and Privacy
  Peer review discussions and documented feedback must be kept confidential to maintain trust and protect both reviewers and the nurse being evaluated.
• Non-Maleficence and Beneficence
  Feedback must do no harm; it should be delivered in a way that safeguards the emotional safety of the recipient. Delivering feedback respectfully and ensuring well-being are foundational ethical duties.
• Fairness (Justice) and Respect for Persons
  Peer review must be equitable—regardless of experience, demographic background, or unit. Every nurse should be treated respectfully, with autonomy and dignity upheld, mirroring principles from the Belmont Report. 
• Emotional Safety for Reviewers
  Peer reviewers also carry emotional responsibility. Institutions should provide support mechanisms—debriefing, mentoring, or resilience resources—especially if reviewing distressing cases.

How Can Nurses Improve Their Peer Review Skills?

Enhancing peer review skills is essential for strengthening feedback culture, supporting professional development, and elevating the standard of nursing care. The following strategies outline how nurses can refine their abilities through structured training, self-reflection, and effective mentorship.

What Training Opportunities Exist for Developing Peer Review Skills?

1. Training Opportunities for Developing Peer Review Skills

• Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Programs
  Resources like Nursing Times’ CPD Zone offer online learning modules, assessments, and e-portfolios that support reflective practice and feedback techniques. These units enhance nurses’ ability to assess and provide constructive feedback using standardized frameworks.
  
  
• Simulation Workshops & Role-Play
  In-person or virtual sessions allow nurses to practice delivering and receiving peer feedback in simulated scenarios—such as handling documentation errors or communication breakdowns—using structured peer review templates and real-time feedback examples.
• Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Mentorship Programs
  Structured mentoring, often separate from performance evaluation, supports the long-term integration of evidence into clinical practice. Mentors help nurses scaffold feedback based on best practices while solidifying critical thinking and review competencies.

How Can Self-Assessment Enhance Peer Review Competency?

• Reflective Practice
  Engaging in regular reflection—analyzing one’s actions, motivations, and outcomes—helps nurses sharpen clinical judgment, uncover blind spots, and consciously improve how they both give and receive feedback. This process nurtures lifelong learning and bridges the gap between theory and daily practice.
  
  
• Master Adaptive Learner (MAL) Framework
  The MAL model supports nurses in setting personalized improvement goals, self-monitoring progress, adapting to new situations, and integrating peer feedback. This self-regulated learning enhances peer review efficacy and adaptability.
  
  
• Peer Assessment Practice
  Practicing reviews of peers—even outside formal settings—sharpens evaluative skills. Reviewing documentation or simulated cases with a focus on structure, clarity, and feedback quality improves one’s own peer review capability.

What Role Does Mentorship Play in Peer Review Development?

• Formal vs. Informal Mentorship
  Formal programs—matching mentors and mentees around professional goals—provide structured guidance. Informal mentorship, by contrast, evolves more organically with strong rapport and can offer more holistic growth. Effective mentorship relies on good communication, collegiality, and reciprocal learning.
  
  
• Peer Mentoring Among Critical Care Nurses
  Peer-to-peer mentoring, especially in high-stress environments like ICU, supports review skills and learning. One study showed that critical care nursing students benefited significantly from structured peer mentoring, highlighting the importance of integrating mentorship into core nursing competencies.
  
  
• Mentorship for Compassionate Care
  A program in Pakistan demonstrated that on-the-job mentorship inspired compassionate care and improved job satisfaction. This model, which integrated reflective feedback, enhanced nurses’ capacity to deliver meaningful peer feedback aligned with patient-centered values.
  
  
• Broader Benefits of Mentorship
  Mentoring delivers both psychosocial support (role modeling, emotional encouragement) and career-related guidance (goal-setting, progression). It strengthens commitment, retention, and the ability to give peer feedback confidently.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do you write in a nursing peer review?

In a nursing peer review, you objectively assess a nurse’s clinical performance, adherence to protocols, communication skills, and patient care quality. You include observations, evidence-based evaluations, constructive feedback, and suggestions for improvement—framed respectfully and professionally.

What is a good example of a peer review?

“During the shift on July 5th, Sarah demonstrated excellent prioritization by quickly addressing a deteriorating patient. She followed sepsis protocols promptly and escalated care without delay. Her handoff communication was clear and complete. Continued attention to timely documentation would enhance patient continuity.”

What is an example of good feedback for a nurse?

“Your calm demeanor and clear communication during the patient code helped maintain team focus. I appreciate how you reassured the family throughout the event. One suggestion is to ensure all code notes are entered immediately after the event to avoid missing critical details.”

How to write a good peer review?

To write a good peer review, be objective, specific, and constructive. Use examples from clinical practice, focus on behaviors (not personality), and apply professional standards. Balance positive feedback with actionable suggestions, and always maintain confidentiality and respect.